Re: [PATCHv4 0/9] zsmalloc/zram: configurable zspage size

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (22/11/11 09:03), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> for class in classes:
>     wasted_bytes += class->pages_per_zspage * PAGE_SIZE - an object size
> 
> with *aggressive zpage compaction*. Now, we are relying on shrinker
> (it might be already enough) to trigger but we could change the policy 
> wasted memory in the class size crossed a threshold

Compaction does something good only when we can release zspage in the
end. Otherwise we just hold the global pool->lock (assuming that we
land zsmalloc writeback series) and simply move objects around zspages.
So ability to limit zspage chain size still can be valuable, on another
level, as a measure to reduce dependency on compaction success.

We may be can make compaction slightly more successful. For instance,
if we would start move objects not only within zspages of the same size
class, but, for example, move objects to class size + X (upper size
classes). As an example, when all zspages in class are almost full,
but class size + 1 has almost empty pages. In other words sort of as
is those classes had been merged. (virtual merge). Single pool->look
would be handy for it.

But this is more of a research project (intern project?), with unclear
outcome and ETA. I think in the mean time we can let people start
experimenting with various zspage chain sizes so that may be at some
point we can arrive to a new "default" value for all zspool, higher
than current 4, which has been around for many years. Can't think, at
present, of a better way forward.