[syzbot] possible deadlock in btrfs_dirty_inode

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Nov 14 2022 - 12:55:52 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] timers: Add timer_shutdown_sync() to be called before freeing timers"
Previous message: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [syzbot] KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in ext4_enable_quotas"
Next in thread: syzbot: "Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in btrfs_dirty_inode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 094226ad94f4 Linux 6.1-rc5
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=152efa11880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=b338c1b9de0823a3
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=37edf86c9b60581e523f
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3b689839e3f5/disk-094226ad.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a4f2a27061e6/vmlinux-094226ad.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/37b109ab179c/bzImage-094226ad.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+37edf86c9b60581e523f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/15801 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807b322650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_dirty_inode+0xcc/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6085

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888027b98fd8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:87 [inline]
ffff888027b98fd8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x14d/0x2b0 mm/util.c:518

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
__might_fault+0xb2/0x110 mm/memory.c:5646
_copy_to_user+0x26/0x130 lib/usercopy.c:29
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:169 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_rootref+0x8cf/0xa90 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3203
btrfs_ioctl+0xb7c/0xc10 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5556
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfb/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #3 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
down_read_nested+0x3c/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1634
__btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x2b4/0x400 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1665 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x495/0x2fe0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1985
__lookup_free_space_inode fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:87 [inline]
lookup_free_space_inode+0x272/0x820 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:134
btrfs_remove_free_space_inode+0xe3/0x470 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:246
cleanup_free_space_cache_v1 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:4092 [inline]
btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0xf1/0x210 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:4120
btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x3fe/0x660 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3265
open_ctree+0x27e6/0x2d6d fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3792
btrfs_fill_super+0x1c6/0x2d0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1461
btrfs_mount_root+0x885/0x9a0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1829
legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1531
fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1043 [inline]
vfs_kern_mount+0xc9/0x160 fs/namespace.c:1073
btrfs_mount+0x3d3/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1889
legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1531
do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3040
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3568
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
join_transaction+0x19f/0xe60 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:299
start_transaction+0x6fb/0x1180 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:658
btrfs_create_common+0x2c6/0x420 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6633
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline]
path_openat+0x12d0/0x2df0 fs/namei.c:3710
do_filp_open+0x264/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3740
do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1310
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1342 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1337 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x243/0x290 fs/open.c:1337
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #1 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
join_transaction+0x17a/0xe60 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:298
start_transaction+0x6fb/0x1180 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:658
btrfs_create_common+0x2c6/0x420 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6633
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline]
path_openat+0x12d0/0x2df0 fs/namei.c:3710
do_filp_open+0x264/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3740
do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1310
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1342 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1337 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x243/0x290 fs/open.c:1337
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1898/0x6ae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831
__lock_acquire+0x1292/0x1f60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1826 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1948 [inline]
start_transaction+0x5cb/0x1180 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:652
btrfs_dirty_inode+0xcc/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6085
inode_update_time fs/inode.c:1871 [inline]
touch_atime+0x315/0x630 fs/inode.c:1944
file_accessed include/linux/fs.h:2521 [inline]
btrfs_file_mmap+0xbb/0x120 fs/btrfs/file.c:2333
call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2196 [inline]
mmap_region+0xff6/0x1e00 mm/mmap.c:2625
do_mmap+0x8d9/0xf60 mm/mmap.c:1412
vm_mmap_pgoff+0x19e/0x2b0 mm/util.c:520
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x48c/0x6d0 mm/mmap.c:1458
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00 --> &mm->mmap_lock#2

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
lock(sb_internal#2);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor.2/15801:
#0: ffff888027b98fd8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:87 [inline]
#0: ffff888027b98fd8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x14d/0x2b0 mm/util.c:518
#1: ffff88807b322460 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: file_accessed include/linux/fs.h:2521 [inline]
#1: ffff88807b322460 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_file_mmap+0xbb/0x120 fs/btrfs/file.c:2333

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 15801 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x390 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1898/0x6ae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831
__lock_acquire+0x1292/0x1f60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x182/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1826 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1948 [inline]
start_transaction+0x5cb/0x1180 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:652
btrfs_dirty_inode+0xcc/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6085
inode_update_time fs/inode.c:1871 [inline]
touch_atime+0x315/0x630 fs/inode.c:1944
file_accessed include/linux/fs.h:2521 [inline]
btrfs_file_mmap+0xbb/0x120 fs/btrfs/file.c:2333
call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2196 [inline]
mmap_region+0xff6/0x1e00 mm/mmap.c:2625
do_mmap+0x8d9/0xf60 mm/mmap.c:1412
vm_mmap_pgoff+0x19e/0x2b0 mm/util.c:520
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x48c/0x6d0 mm/mmap.c:1458
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f4d3fe8b639
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f4d40c4e168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000009
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4d3ffac050 RCX: 00007f4d3fe8b639
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000b36000 RDI: 0000000020000000
RBP: 00007f4d3fee6ae9 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000028011 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffedddb50ff R14: 00007f4d40c4e300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] timers: Add timer_shutdown_sync() to be called before freeing timers"
Previous message: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: [syzbot] KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in ext4_enable_quotas"
Next in thread: syzbot: "Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in btrfs_dirty_inode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]