RE: [Patch v2 1/3] arm: exynos: Add new compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC.

[Aakarsh Jain]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzk@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 10 November 2022 13:56
> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski'
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx;
> mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx;
> ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx;
> benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> stanimir.varbanov@xxxxxxxxxx; dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx;
> david.plowman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andi@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; aswani.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; smitha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/3] arm: exynos: Add new compatible string for
> Exynos3250 SoC.
> 
> On 09/11/2022 15:44, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: 09 November 2022 14:31
> >> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-
> >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx;
> >> mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx;
> >> ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx;
> >> benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> stanimir.varbanov@xxxxxxxxxx; dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx;
> >> david.plowman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
> >> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andi@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; aswani.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; smitha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/3] arm: exynos: Add new compatible string
> >> for
> >> Exynos3250 SoC.
> >>
> >> On 09/11/2022 04:55, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> >>> Since,MFC v7 support was added for Exynos5420 and Exynos
> >>> 3250 SoC with same compatible string "samsung,mfc-v7".As both SoCs
> >>> having different hardware properties and having same compatible
> >>> string for both SoCs doesn't seems to be correct.
> >>> New compatible is added for Exynos3250 SOC which will differentiate
> >>> the node properties for both SoCs which support MFC v7.
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai
> >> <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt | 9 +++++----
> >>
> >> Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem (git log --oneline -- ...).
> >>
> > As with recent commits on
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt with git log --
> oneline --  ,  subject prefix doesn't seems to be consistent.
> >
> > b1394dc151cb media: s5p-mfc: Adding initial support for MFC v10.10
> > 60641e22599a [media] s5p-mfc: Use preallocated block allocator always
> > for MFC v6+
> > 003611334d55 [media] s5p-mfc: Add support for MFC v8 available in
> > Exynos 5433 SoCs
> > 0da658704136 ARM: dts: convert to generic power domain bindings for
> > exynos DT 77634289286a ARM: dts: Update clocks entry in MFC binding
> > documentation
> > 2eae613b95a7 ARM: EXYNOS: Add MFC device tree support
> 
> s5p-mfc is not a subsystem.
> 
> git log --oneline  -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/
> 
> media: dt-bindings: NAME_OF_FILE:
> 
Thanks for clarification.
> 
> >
> > Closest is ARM: dts.
> 
> This is not ARM subsystem and not a DTS file.
> 
> > so what is your suggestion on this?
> >
> > Anyway we are in a process of converting this txt file to yaml .
> >
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof