Re: [PATCH] lib/radix-tree: Fix uninitialized variable compilation

From: Yonghong Song
Date: Thu Nov 10 2022 - 22:50:51 EST

Next message: Abel Wu: "Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: favor non-idle group in tick preemption"
Previous message: Yinbo Zhu: "[PATCH v9 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add loongson-2 pinctrl"
In reply to: Rong Tao: "[PATCH] lib/radix-tree: Fix uninitialized variable compilation"
Next in thread: Rong Tao: "The subject of the previous email error"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/10/22 6:18 PM, Rong Tao wrote:

Hi, Song, thanks for your reply. I'm wondering if i want to fix code in
tools/include/uapi/linux/in.h next time, should i just modify
include/uapi/linux/in.h, and it will auto 'Sync' to tools/include/uapi/
linux/in.h? Or i need to modify tools/include/uapi/linux/in.h at the
same time?

Either way is okay. If you do 'git log' on tools/include/uapi/linux
directory, you can find examples for both approaches.

Next message: Abel Wu: "Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: favor non-idle group in tick preemption"
Previous message: Yinbo Zhu: "[PATCH v9 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add loongson-2 pinctrl"
In reply to: Rong Tao: "[PATCH] lib/radix-tree: Fix uninitialized variable compilation"
Next in thread: Rong Tao: "The subject of the previous email error"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]