Re: [PATCH 1/3] mailbox: pcc: rename platform interrupt bit macro name

[Sudeep Holla]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 09:50:32AM +0800, Huisong Li wrote:
> Currently, the name of platform interrupt bit macro, ACPI_PCCT_DOORBELL,
> is not very appropriate. The doorbell is generally considered as an action
> when send mailbox data. Actually, the macro value comes from Platform
> Interrupt in Platform Communications Channel Global Flags. If the bit is
> '1', it means that the platform is capable of generating an interrupt to
> indicate completion of a command.
>

This is touching ACPICA header file, so it must be submitted to ACPICA
separately following the guidelines in the github and imported into the
kernel.

However, I don't see any point in this change. Yes the language "doorbell"
is not used in this particular context in the spec, but it is implicit from
other parts. I am not opposing the change though if Rafael is OK and ACPICA
project accepts it.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep