Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: Fix example

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, 04 Nov 2022 17:38:28 +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Despite not being listed nor required within the top level nvmem yaml
> file, the "compatible" property is mandatory and is actually enforced by
> all the nvmem provider bindings.
> 
> Unfortunately, the lack of compatible in the nvmem.yaml to level
> description file lead to the example not matching anything and thus not
> being checked at all.
> 
> Let's pick a compatible almost randomly (one which is already used with
> the qfprom label) to make the example at least valid on a semantic
> point of view and getting it checked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>