Re: [PATCH] Update Nanobone

[Mark Jackson]

On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 07:37, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The separate defconfig should not be needed. Please send any defconfig
> changes to multi_v7_defconfig or omap2plu_defconfig as separate patches.
>
> Note that you can run make savedefconfig first to produce a minimal diff.
> Then if adding device drivers, please add them as loadable modules where
> possible.

But using the omap2plus_defconfig increases my kernel to 4.7MB

My "custom" one has been specifically designed for the NANO platform
and currently sits at about 3.7MB (which nicely fits into the ~4MB memory
bank allocated to the kernel)

Hence the use of my custom defconfig.

I don't have modules enabled as the platform functionality is pretty fixed.

The defconfig I posted was created using savedefconfig.
Is it still wrong ?

Cheers
Mark J.