Re: [PATCH v13,0/3] Add dpi output format control for MT8186

From: Matthias Brugger
Date: Wed Nov 09 2022 - 06:17:43 EST


Hi Xinlei,

On 09/11/2022 03:40, Xinlei Lee (李昕磊) wrote:
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 19:27 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
Hi Xinlei,

Somehow b4 broke with your thread but I was able to apply patch 1 and
2 by hand.

Thanks
Matthias

On 24/10/2022 04:04, xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Base on the branch of linus/master v6.1 rc1.
> > Change since v12:
> 1. Add MT8186_ prefix to variables added in mt8186-mmsys.h file.
> > Change since v11:
> 1. Rebase on v6.1-rc1. Change nothing.
> > Change since v10:
> 1. Modify patch title and add review tag.
> > Change since v9:
> 1. Modify the location of the mmsys_dev member variable.
> > Change since v8:
> 1. Modified the title and some description information.
> > Changes since v7:
> 1. This series is based on the following patch:
> [1] soc: mediatek: Add mmsys func to adapt to dpi output for
> MT8186
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1663161662-1598-2-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!3tXTL3P6SgcP8Q_rcyCro64dxIXE6VuVbcNftU0ZnX6TNtU1akXwd96YfnoJs_fEig$
> > 2. Modify the DPI_FORMAT_MASK macro definition to GENMASK(1, 0);
> 3. Add all settings to mtk_mmsys_ddp_dpi_fmt_config;
> 4. Modify the commit title to Add mt8186 dpi compatibles and
> platform
> data.
> > Changes since v6:
> 1. Different from other ICs, when mt8186 DPI changes the output
> format,
> the mmsys_base+400 register needs to be set to be valid at the same
> time.
> In this series, all the situations that mmsys need to be set up
> are
> perfected (not necessarily used in practice).
> 2. Put the value that controls the mmsys function in mtk-mmsys.h.
> 3. Encountered the sink ic switched between dual edge and single
> edge,
> perfected setting and clearing mmsys bit operations in mtk_dpi.c.
> > Changes since v5:
> 1. Separate the patch that adds edge_cfg_in_mmsys from the patch
> that
> adds mt8186 dpi support.
> 2. Move the mmsys register definition to mmsys driver.
> > Changes since v4:
> 1. This series of cancellations is based on the following patches:
> [1] Add MediaTek SoC(vdosys1) support for mt8195
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/cover/20220711075245.10492-1-nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!3tXTL3P6SgcP8Q_rcyCro64dxIXE6VuVbcNftU0ZnX6TNtU1akXwd96Yfnqv0_QYpg$
> > [2] Add MediaTek SoC DRM (vdosys1) support for mt8195
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/cover/20220804072827.22383-1-nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!3tXTL3P6SgcP8Q_rcyCro64dxIXE6VuVbcNftU0ZnX6TNtU1akXwd96YfnoZMZ_peA$
> > 2. Added mtk_mmsys_update_bits function in mtk-mmsys.c;
> 3. MMSYS 0x400 register is modified to
> MT8186_MMSYS_DPI_OUTPUT_FORMAT;
> 4. Fix formatting issues.
> > Changes since v3:
> 1. Fix formatting issues;
> 2. Modify the edge output control name & description;
> 3. Fix the threading problem.
> > Changes since v2:
> 1. Modify key nouns in the description;
> 2. Add the label of jitao to Co-developed-by;
> 3. Macro definition address lowercase problem and function naming;
> 4. Add missing a description of this property in the mtk_dpi_conf.
> > Change since v1:
> 1. Modify mt8186 compatiable location.
> 2. Modify MT8186_DPI_OUTPUT_FORMAT name.
> > When MT8186 outputs dpi signal, it is necessary to add dual edge
> output
> format control in mmsys.
> > Xinlei Lee (3):
> soc: mediatek: Add all settings to mtk_mmsys_ddp_dpi_fmt_config
> func
> drm: mediatek: Set dpi format in mmsys
> drm: mediatek: Add mt8186 dpi compatibles and platform data
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 32
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 2 ++
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8186-mmsys.h | 8 ++++---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++--
> ---
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 7 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>

Hi Matthias:

Is your problem solved?

I tried to pull the series in link[1] to the kernel 6.1-rc1 version,
the patches are all successfully applied, and the patch in link[1]
looks complete.

If you still think there is something wrong, please let me know and I
can send a new version to try to fix it.

Everything is fine, no worries.

Thanks for asking.
Matthias


[1]:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/cover/1666577099-3859-1-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx/

Best Regards!
xinlei

************* MEDIATEK Confidentiality Notice
********************
The information contained in this e-mail message (including any
attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise
exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be
conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination,
distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its
attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may
be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe
that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of
this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not
disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!