Re: [PATCH v28 05/11] soc: mediatek: refine code to use mtk_mmsys_update_bits API

From: Matthias Brugger
Date: Tue Nov 08 2022 - 12:37:29 EST




On 07/11/2022 08:22, Nancy.Lin wrote:
Simplify code for update mmsys reg.

Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 45 ++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
index 9a327eb5d9d7..73c8bd27e6ae 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
@@ -99,22 +99,27 @@ struct mtk_mmsys {
struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
};
+static void mtk_mmsys_update_bits(struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys, u32 offset, u32 mask, u32 val)
+{
+ u32 tmp;
+
+ tmp = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + offset);
+ tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | (val & mask);

I'm not sure about the change in the implementation of mtk_mmsys_update_bits(). Nicolas tried to explain it to me on IRC but I wasn't totally convincing. As we have to go for at least another round of this patches, I'd like to get a clear understanding while it is needed that val bits are set to 1 in the mask.

Regards,
Matthias

+ writel_relaxed(tmp, mmsys->regs + offset);
+}
+
void mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect(struct device *dev,
enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next)
{
struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
const struct mtk_mmsys_routes *routes = mmsys->data->routes;
- u32 reg;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < mmsys->data->num_routes; i++)
- if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next == routes[i].to_comp) {
- reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);
- reg &= ~routes[i].mask;
- reg |= routes[i].val;
- writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);
- }
+ if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next == routes[i].to_comp)
+ mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, routes[i].addr, routes[i].mask,
+ routes[i].val);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect);
@@ -124,27 +129,14 @@ void mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect(struct device *dev,
{
struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
const struct mtk_mmsys_routes *routes = mmsys->data->routes;
- u32 reg;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < mmsys->data->num_routes; i++)
- if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next == routes[i].to_comp) {
- reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);
- reg &= ~routes[i].mask;
- writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);
- }
+ if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next == routes[i].to_comp)
+ mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, routes[i].addr, routes[i].mask, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect);
-static void mtk_mmsys_update_bits(struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys, u32 offset, u32 mask, u32 val)
-{
- u32 tmp;
-
- tmp = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + offset);
- tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | val;
- writel_relaxed(tmp, mmsys->regs + offset);
-}
-
void mtk_mmsys_ddp_dpi_fmt_config(struct device *dev, u32 val)
{
if (val)
@@ -161,18 +153,13 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned l
{
struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = container_of(rcdev, struct mtk_mmsys, rcdev);
unsigned long flags;
- u32 reg;
spin_lock_irqsave(&mmsys->lock, flags);
- reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset);
-
if (assert)
- reg &= ~BIT(id);
+ mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset, BIT(id), 0);
else
- reg |= BIT(id);
-
- writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset);
+ mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset, BIT(id), BIT(id));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmsys->lock, flags);