Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface

[Tariq Toukan]

On 11/3/2022 4:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:49:56 +0100 Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > Tariq pointed out in [1] that drivers allocating IRQ vectors would benefit
> > from having smarter NUMA-awareness (cpumask_local_spread() doesn't quite cut
> > it).
> >
> > The proposed interface involved an array of CPUs and a temporary cpumask, and
> > being my difficult self what I'm proposing here is an interface that doesn't
> > require any temporary storage other than some stack variables (at the cost of
> > one wild macro).
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220728191203.4055-1-tariqt@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Not sure who's expected to take these, no preference here so:
>
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for ironing it out!

Thanks Jakub.

Valentin, what do you think?
Shouldn't it go through the sched branch?