Re: [PATCHv4 2/9] zram: Add recompression algorithm sysfs knob

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (22/11/04 09:34), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > So, as far as I understand, we don't have reason to add remove_recomp_algo
> > > > right now. And existing recomp_algo does not enforce any particular format,
> > > > it can be extended. Right now we accept "$name" but can do something like
> > > > "$name:$priority". The only thing that we probably need to do is rename
> > > > recomp_algo to either add_recomp_algo or register_recomp_algo?
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I like the name and priority format.
> > > 
> > > Only question is how we could support algorithm selection change
> > > under considering multiple secondary algorithms.
> > 
> > So what I was thinking about, and I'm still in the mental model that
> > re-compression is a user-space event, just like writeback, extension
> > of recompress sysfs knob with "algo_index" (or something similar) which
> > will mirror algorithm priority.
> > 
> > Example:
> > 
> > Configure 2 alternative algos, with priority 1 and 2
> > 
> > 	echo "name=lz4 priority=1" > recomp_algo
> > 	echo "name=lz5 priority=2" > recomp_algo
> > 
> > Recompress pages using algo 1 and algo 2
> > 
> > 	echo "type=huge threshold=3000 algo_idx=1" > recompress
> > 	echo "type=idle threshold=2000 algo_idx=2" > recompress
> > 
> > Maybe we can even pass algo name instead of idx.
> 
> Let's use name rather than index.

OK. Any preference on the keyword? "name="? "algo="? "algorithm="?
"compressor="? "comp="?

I want use the same keyword for recomp_algo. I sort of like "algo=",
but not sure.