Re: [PATCH] Documentation: process: Describe kernel version prefix for third option

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On 11/1/22 20:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 
> No, sorry, this is not needed and does not have to be in the subject
> line at all.
> 
> The current wording is fine, it's just that people don't always read it.
> 
> so consider this a NAK.
> 

Hi Greg,

There was a case when a submitter submitted multiple backports (which
qualified for third option) without specifying the prefix, hence a
reviewer complained [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221101074351.GA8310@amd/

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara