RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v14 2/7] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Fix indentation of the struct epf_ntb_ctrl

From: Frank Li
Date: Tue Nov 01 2022 - 12:08:11 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 6:56 AM
> To: Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: allenbh@xxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx;
> helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jdmason@xxxxxxxx;
> kw@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx; ntb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v14 2/7] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Fix
> indentation of the struct epf_ntb_ctrl
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:56:58AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > From: Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Indentation of the struct epf_ntb_ctrl align with other struct
> >
>
> "Align the indentation of struct epf_ntb_ctrl with other structs in the driver"
>
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 28 +++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> > index c0115bcb3b5e..1863006cc36c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> > @@ -99,20 +99,20 @@ enum epf_ntb_bar {
> > * NTB Driver NTB Driver
> > */
> > struct epf_ntb_ctrl {
> > - u32 command;
> > - u32 argument;
> > - u16 command_status;
> > - u16 link_status;
> > - u32 topology;
> > - u64 addr;
> > - u64 size;
> > - u32 num_mws;
> > - u32 reserved;
> > - u32 spad_offset;
> > - u32 spad_count;
> > - u32 db_entry_size;
> > - u32 db_data[MAX_DB_COUNT];
> > - u32 db_offset[MAX_DB_COUNT];
> > + u32 command;
> > + u32 argument;
> > + u16 command_status;
> > + u16 link_status;
> > + u32 topology;
> > + u64 addr;
> > + u64 size;
> > + u32 num_mws;
> > + u32 reserved;
> > + u32 spad_offset;
> > + u32 spad_count;
> > + u32 db_entry_size;
> > + u32 db_data[MAX_DB_COUNT];
> > + u32 db_offset[MAX_DB_COUNT];
>
> General question: Don't we need to take care of endianess here?

[Frank Li] you are right. But it is out of scope of this patch.
We can add it later.

>
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
> > } __packed;
> >
> > struct epf_ntb {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்