Re: [PATCH] mm/gup: fix gup_pud_range() for dax

From: Yu Zhao
Date: Thu Oct 20 2022 - 18:19:35 EST


On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:14 PM Saurabh Sengar
<ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: John Starks <jostarks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For dax pud, pud_huge() returns true on x86. So the function works as long
> as hugetlb is configured. However, dax doesn't depend on hugetlb.
> Commit 414fd080d125 ("mm/gup: fix gup_pmd_range() for dax") fixed
> devmap-backed huge PMDs, but missed devmap-backed huge PUDs. Fix this as
> well.
>
> Fixes: 414fd080d125 ("mm/gup: fix gup_pmd_range() for dax")
> Signed-off-by: John Starks <jostarks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 05068d3d2557..9e07aa54a4cd 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -2687,7 +2687,7 @@ static int gup_pud_range(p4d_t *p4dp, p4d_t p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned lo
> next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> if (unlikely(!pud_present(pud)))
> return 0;
> - if (unlikely(pud_huge(pud))) {
> + if (unlikely(pud_huge(pud) || pud_devmap(pud))) {

Perhaps s/pud_huge/pud_leaf/ ?

> if (!gup_huge_pud(pud, pudp, addr, next, flags,
> pages, nr))
> return 0;
> --
> 2.25.1
>