Re: [PATCH 06/16] x86/boot: Setup memory protection for bzImage code

[Evgeniy Baskov]

On 2022-10-19 10:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 11:41, Evgeniy Baskov wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S 
> > b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> > index 5273367283b7..889ca7176aa7 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> > @@ -602,6 +603,28 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(.Lrelocated)
> >  	jmp	*%rax
> >  SYM_FUNC_END(.Lrelocated)
> >
> > +SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(startup32_enable_nx_if_supported)
> > +	pushq	%rbx
> > +
> > +	leaq	has_nx(%rip), %rcx
> > +
> > +	mov	$0x80000001, %eax
> > +	cpuid
> > +	btl	$20, %edx
>
> btl $(X86_FEATURE_NX & 31), %edx
>
> But also need to check for the availability of the extended leaf in the
> first place.

Yes, thank you for suggestion, that looks more readable. I will
also add the leaf node check. Is there any processor though that
supports long mode and does not support 0x80000001 leaf node?

> > +	jnc	.Lnonx
> > +
> > +	movl	$1, (%rcx)
>
> Your pointer has been clobbered with some feature flags.

Thanks, I apparently forgot to include fix for this into a patch set...

> movl $1, has_nx(%rip)
>
> will work fine without needing the intermediary lea.
>
> ~Andrew