Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree with the mtd-fixes tree

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi,

sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:08:07 +1100:

> Hi Rafał,
> 
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:31:57 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > this isn't exactly the correct fix, of_node_get() is still needed.
> > 
> > I'll make sure we let Linus know about this conflict (and solution) when
> > sending 6.2 pull request.
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > index 07249af4f890..20fcedc3021e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> > @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void mtd_check_of_node(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> >   	if (!mtd_is_partition(mtd))
> >   		return;
> > 
> > -	parent_dn = mtd_get_of_node(mtd->parent);
> > +	parent_dn = of_node_get(mtd_get_of_node(mtd->parent));
> >   	if (!parent_dn)
> >   		return;
> >   
> 
> 
> Thanks for checking.  I have added that to my resolution for tomorrow
> onward.

Thanks Rafał for the right resolution and Stephen for carrying the fix.
I'll send the fixes PR soon and rebase on top of an -rc containing it
to avoid this conflict resolution to be needed when sending the final
PR to Linus during the next MW.

Thanks,
Miquèl