Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] phy: qcom-qmp-pcie: add register init helper

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Wed Oct 19 2022 - 10:05:31 EST


On 19/10/2022 16:25, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 04:12:02PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 19/10/2022 14:35, Johan Hovold wrote:
Generalise the serdes initialisation helper so that it can be used to
initialise all the PHY registers (e.g. serdes, tx, rx, pcs).

Note that this defers the ungating of the PIPE clock somewhat, which is
fine as it isn't needed until starting the PHY.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c | 51 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c
index dd7e72424fc0..f57d10f20277 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c
@@ -1820,46 +1820,32 @@ static void qmp_pcie_configure(void __iomem *base,
qmp_pcie_configure_lane(base, tbl, num, 0xff);
}
-static void qmp_pcie_serdes_init(struct qmp_pcie *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg_tables *tables)
-{
- void __iomem *serdes = qmp->serdes;
-
- if (!tables)
- return;
-
- qmp_pcie_configure(serdes, tables->serdes, tables->serdes_num);
-}
-
-static void qmp_pcie_lanes_init(struct qmp_pcie *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg_tables *tables)
+static void qmp_pcie_init_registers(struct qmp_pcie *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg_tables *tbls)
{
const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
+ void __iomem *serdes = qmp->serdes;
void __iomem *tx = qmp->tx;
void __iomem *rx = qmp->rx;
void __iomem *tx2 = qmp->tx2;
void __iomem *rx2 = qmp->rx2;
+ void __iomem *pcs = qmp->pcs;
+ void __iomem *pcs_misc = qmp->pcs_misc;
- if (!tables)
+ if (!tbls)
return;
- qmp_pcie_configure_lane(tx, tables->tx, tables->tx_num, 1);
- qmp_pcie_configure_lane(rx, tables->rx, tables->rx_num, 1);
+ qmp_pcie_configure(serdes, tbls->serdes, tbls->serdes_num);
+
+ qmp_pcie_configure_lane(tx, tbls->tx, tbls->tx_num, 1);
+ qmp_pcie_configure_lane(rx, tbls->rx, tbls->rx_num, 1);
if (cfg->lanes >= 2) {
- qmp_pcie_configure_lane(tx2, tables->tx, tables->tx_num, 2);
- qmp_pcie_configure_lane(rx2, tables->rx, tables->rx_num, 2);
+ qmp_pcie_configure_lane(tx2, tbls->tx, tbls->tx_num, 2);
+ qmp_pcie_configure_lane(rx2, tbls->rx, tbls->rx_num, 2);
}
-}
-
-static void qmp_pcie_pcs_init(struct qmp_pcie *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg_tables *tables)
-{
- void __iomem *pcs = qmp->pcs;
- void __iomem *pcs_misc = qmp->pcs_misc;
-
- if (!tables)
- return;
- qmp_pcie_configure(pcs, tables->pcs, tables->pcs_num);
- qmp_pcie_configure(pcs_misc, tables->pcs_misc, tables->pcs_misc_num);
+ qmp_pcie_configure(pcs, tbls->pcs, tbls->pcs_num);
+ qmp_pcie_configure(pcs_misc, tbls->pcs_misc, tbls->pcs_misc_num);

Nit: could we please keep it as `tables'?

I considered that but found that the longer identifier hurt
readability so I prefer to use "tbls" here.

Compare

qmp_pcie_configure(serdes, tbls->serdes, tbls->serdes_num);

qmp_pcie_configure_lane(tx, tbls->tx, tbls->tx_num, 1);
qmp_pcie_configure_lane(rx, tbls->rx, tbls->rx_num, 1);

if (cfg->lanes >= 2) {
qmp_pcie_configure_lane(tx2, tbls->tx, tbls->tx_num, 2);
qmp_pcie_configure_lane(rx2, tbls->rx, tbls->rx_num, 2);
}

qmp_pcie_configure(pcs, tbls->pcs, tbls->pcs_num);
qmp_pcie_configure(pcs_misc, tbls->pcs_misc, tbls->pcs_misc_num);

with

qmp_pcie_configure(serdes, tables->serdes, tables->serdes_num);

qmp_pcie_configure_lane(tx, tables->tx, tables->tx_num, 1);
qmp_pcie_configure_lane(rx, tables->rx, tables->rx_num, 1);

if (cfg->lanes >= 2) {
qmp_pcie_configure_lane(tx2, tables->tx, tables->tx_num, 2);
qmp_pcie_configure_lane(rx2, tables->rx, tables->rx_num, 2);
}

qmp_pcie_configure(pcs, tables->pcs, tables->pcs_num);
qmp_pcie_configure(pcs_misc, tables->pcs_misc, tables->pcs_misc_num);

I'd say, it's up to Vinod. I'd prefer the second version.


--
With best wishes
Dmitry