RE: [PATCH] staging: pi433: Use div64_u64 instead of do_div

From: David Laight
Date: Wed Oct 19 2022 - 07:03:47 EST


From: Kang Minchul
> Sent: 19 October 2022 10:40
>
> This commit removes warning generated by cocci as follows:
>
> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
>
> Using div64_u64 instead of do_div can avoid potential truncation.

Cocci is lying to you.

do_div() exists because a 64 by 32 bit divide is significantly
faster than a 64 by 64 divide.
This is particularly true on 32bit cpu, but is also true on
Intel x86_64 bit cpu.

So unless the result might actually be larger than 32 bits
(which requires code analysis) then do_div() is correct.

David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)