Re: [PATCH 0/4] kunit: more assertion reworking

From: Miguel Ojeda
Date: Tue Oct 18 2022 - 19:40:09 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:52:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Previous message: Josh Poimboeuf: "Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT"
In reply to: Daniel Latypov: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] kunit: more assertion reworking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:26 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> No worries.
> You've had a very busy couple of weeks, I imagine.

Just a bit :) Nevertheless, it was my intention to reply :(

I have linked this thread from the PR noting that you warned me about
the future conflict [1], thanks again!

[1] https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/915#issuecomment-1283138279

Cheers,
Miguel

Next message: kernel test robot: "arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:52:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Previous message: Josh Poimboeuf: "Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT"
In reply to: Daniel Latypov: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] kunit: more assertion reworking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]