Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: tegra: Convert to immutable irq chip

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue Oct 18 2022 - 03:28:43 EST


Hi Svyatoslav,

On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 7:30 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Update the driver to use an immutable IRQ chip to fix this warning:
>
> "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
>
> Preserve per-chip labels by adding an ->irq_print_chip() callback.
>
> Tested-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> # TF201 T30
> Tested-by: Robert Eckelmann <longnoserob@xxxxxxxxx> # TF101 T20
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 6ebd28bd087127ab
("gpio: tegra: Convert to immutable irq chip") in next-20221018.

noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx reports a build failure introduced by
this commit on e.g. m68k-allmodconfig:

drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c:616:48: error: 'tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake'
undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean
'tegra_gpio_irq_set_type'?


> index e4fb4cb38a0f..6b469253fad8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c

> @@ -598,10 +600,43 @@ static void tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources(struct irq_data *d)
> tegra_gpio_enable(tgi, d->hwirq);
> }
>
> +static void tegra_gpio_irq_print_chip(struct irq_data *d, struct seq_file *s)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +
> + seq_printf(s, dev_name(chip->parent));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_chip tegra_gpio_irq_chip = {
> + .irq_shutdown = tegra_gpio_irq_shutdown,
> + .irq_ack = tegra_gpio_irq_ack,
> + .irq_mask = tegra_gpio_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = tegra_gpio_irq_unmask,
> + .irq_set_type = tegra_gpio_irq_set_type,
> + .irq_set_wake = pm_sleep_ptr(tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake),

This is an unrelated change, breaking the build if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
is not set: the function pointer argument of pm_sleep_ptr() is always
referenced, so the function definition must not be protected by #ifdef
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.

As tegra_gpio_{resume,suspend}() are also in that section, you probably
want to convert the references to them to the new macros introduced by
commit 1a3c7bb088266fa2 ("PM: core: Add new *_PM_OPS macros,
deprecate old ones"), too.

Or just revert this change for now.

> + .irq_print_chip = tegra_gpio_irq_print_chip,
> + .irq_request_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_request_resources,
> + .irq_release_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources,
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct irq_chip tegra210_gpio_irq_chip = {
> + .irq_shutdown = tegra_gpio_irq_shutdown,
> + .irq_ack = tegra_gpio_irq_ack,
> + .irq_mask = tegra_gpio_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = tegra_gpio_irq_unmask,
> + .irq_set_affinity = tegra_gpio_irq_set_affinity,
> + .irq_set_type = tegra_gpio_irq_set_type,
> + .irq_set_wake = pm_sleep_ptr(tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake),
> + .irq_print_chip = tegra_gpio_irq_print_chip,
> + .irq_request_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_request_resources,
> + .irq_release_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources,
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> -#include <linux/seq_file.h>
>
> static int tegra_dbg_gpio_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> {
> @@ -689,18 +724,6 @@ static int tegra_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> tgi->gc.ngpio = tgi->bank_count * 32;
> tgi->gc.parent = &pdev->dev;
>
> - tgi->ic.name = "GPIO";
> - tgi->ic.irq_ack = tegra_gpio_irq_ack;
> - tgi->ic.irq_mask = tegra_gpio_irq_mask;
> - tgi->ic.irq_unmask = tegra_gpio_irq_unmask;
> - tgi->ic.irq_set_type = tegra_gpio_irq_set_type;
> - tgi->ic.irq_shutdown = tegra_gpio_irq_shutdown;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> - tgi->ic.irq_set_wake = tegra_gpio_irq_set_wake;
> -#endif
> - tgi->ic.irq_request_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_request_resources;
> - tgi->ic.irq_release_resources = tegra_gpio_irq_release_resources;
> -
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tgi);
>
> if (tgi->soc->debounce_supported)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds