Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix "Track with sched_switch" test by not printing warnings in quiet mode

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Mon Oct 17 2022 - 08:33:42 EST


Em Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:47:34AM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
> On 13/10/2022 17:57, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:12 AM James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 12/10/2022 17:50, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:13 AM James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> The test already supplies -q to run in quiet mode, so extend quiet mode
> >>>>> to perf_stdio__warning() and also ui__warning() for consistency.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure if suppressing the warnings with -q is a good thing.
> >>> Maybe we need to separate warning/debug messages from the output.
> >>
> >> I don't see the issue with warnings being suppressed in quiet mode as
> >> long as errors are still printed. In other cases warnings have already
> >> been suppressed by quiet mode and this site is the odd one out.
> >>
> >> What use case are you thinking of where someone explicitly adds -q but
> >> wants to see non fatal warnings?
> >
> > I don't have any specific use case. If it's already suppressed in other
> > cases, I'm fine with it.
> >
>
> Actually I may have been mistaken. Seems like quiet is only used for
> "extra info" type messages rather than warnings. Although the commit
> message does say:
>
> The -q/--quiet option is to suppress any message. Sometimes users just
> want to see the numbers and it can be used for that case.
>
> With 'any' that I would take to include warnings as well. I could move
> warnings to stderr, but this has a much greater chance of breaking
> anyone's workflows that might be looking for warnings on stdout than
> removing warnings when -q is provided.
>
> Also if warnings are moved to stderr and quiet isn't used, there would
> be no way to suppress warnings in the TUI which might actually be a
> useful feature.
>
> So I'm still leaning towards the original change, if you are ok with
> that even though it's not done elsewhere?

Namhyung? I tend to agree with James.

- Arnaldo