Re: [PATCH net-next V3] net: lan743x: Add support to SGMII register dump for PCI11010/PCI11414 chips

From: Raju Lakkaraju
Date: Wed Oct 12 2022 - 01:03:37 EST


Hi Andrew,

Thank you for review comments.

The 10/10/2022 21:35, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> > static int lan743x_get_regs_len(struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > - return MAX_LAN743X_ETH_REGS * sizeof(u32);
> > + struct lan743x_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + u32 num_regs = MAX_LAN743X_ETH_COMMON_REGS;
> > +
> > + if (adapter->is_sgmii_en)
> > + num_regs += MAX_LAN743X_ETH_SGMII_REGS;
> > +
> > + return num_regs * sizeof(u32);
> > }
> >
> > static void lan743x_get_regs(struct net_device *dev,
> > struct ethtool_regs *regs, void *p)
> > {
> > + struct lan743x_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + int regs_len;
> > +
> > + regs_len = lan743x_get_regs_len(dev);
> > + memset(p, 0, regs_len);
> > +
> > regs->version = LAN743X_ETH_REG_VERSION;
> > + regs->len = regs_len;
> > +
> > + lan743x_common_regs(dev, p);
> > + p = (u32 *)p + MAX_LAN743X_ETH_COMMON_REGS;
> >
> > - lan743x_common_regs(dev, regs, p);
> > + if (adapter->is_sgmii_en) {
> > + lan743x_sgmii_regs(dev, p);
> > + p = (u32 *)p + MAX_LAN743X_ETH_SGMII_REGS;
> > + }
>
> This seems O.K. for the moment, but how does it work when you add the
> next set of optional registers? Say you want to add the PTP registers?

Yes.
For other modules (i.e. PTP etc) register dumps, i would like
implement ethtool -w/-W option to configure dump flag.
Existing private flag use for EEPROM/OTP access which we don't use same
flag for register dumps to avoid accidental changes which may damage
EEPROM/OTP sensitive data.

>
> One idea might be to use the LAN743X_ETH_REG_VERSION as a
> bitfield. Bit 0 indicates the common registers are present. Bit 1
> indicates the SGMII registers are present. Bit 2 is for whatever next
> set of optional registers you add, say PTP.

OK.
Otherwise, I will create LAN743X_ETH_REG_FLAGS and follow your
suggestion.

>
> Andrew

--------
Thanks,
Raju