Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Prevent non-first waiter from spinning in down_write() slowpath

From: Mukesh Ojha
Date: Mon Oct 10 2022 - 06:26:09 EST


Hi Waiman,


On 9/29/2022 11:36 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 9/29/22 14:04, Waiman Long wrote:
A non-first waiter can potentially spin in the for loop of
rwsem_down_write_slowpath() without sleeping but fail to acquire the
lock even if the rwsem is free if the following sequence happens:

   Non-first waiter       First waiter      Lock holder
   ----------------       ------------      -----------
   Acquire wait_lock
   rwsem_try_write_lock():
     Set handoff bit if RT or
       wait too long
     Set waiter->handoff_set
   Release wait_lock
                          Acquire wait_lock
                          Inherit waiter->handoff_set
                          Release wait_lock
                       Clear owner
                                            Release lock
   if (waiter.handoff_set) {
     rwsem_spin_on_owner(();
     if (OWNER_NULL)
       goto trylock_again;
   }
   trylock_again:
   Acquire wait_lock
   rwsem_try_write_lock():
      if (first->handoff_set && (waiter != first))
          return false;
   Release wait_lock

It is especially problematic if the non-first waiter is an RT task and
it is running on the same CPU as the first waiter as this can lead to
live lock.

Fixes: d257cc8cb8d5 ("locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 13 ++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Mukesh, can you test if this patch can fix the RT task lockup problem?


Looks like, There is still a window for a race.

There is a chance when a reader who came first added it's BIAS and goes to slowpath and before it gets added to wait list it got preempted by RT task which goes to slowpath as well and being the first waiter gets its hand-off bit set and not able to get the lock due to following condition in rwsem_try_write_lock()

630 if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) { ==> reader has sets its bias
..
...

634
635 new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
636 } else {
637 new |= RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED;


---------------------->----------------------->-------------------------

First reader (1) writer(2) RT task Lock holder(3)

It sets
RWSEM_READER_BIAS.
while it is going to
slowpath(as the lock
was held by (3)) and
before it got added
to the waiters list
it got preempted
by (2).
RT task also takes
the slowpath and add release the
itself into waiting list rwsem lock
and since it is the first clear the
it is the next one to get owner.
the lock but it can not
get the lock as (count &
RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) is set
as (1) has added it but
not able to remove its
adjustment.


-Mukesh


Thanks,
Longman