Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm/tlb: fix error word 'clleared' to 'cleared'

[Nadav Amit]

On Sep 29, 2022, at 2:36 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ⚠ External Email
> 
> Hi--
> 
> I would say let's fix the sentence grammar, but I don't know
> what "cleared set" means.
> 
> 
> On 9/29/22 02:10, Xin Hao wrote:
>> Just correct the wrong word 'clleared' to 'cleared'
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> index cda3118f3b27..c80a15ef0cbc 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags,
>>              diff &= ~_PAGE_ACCESSED;
>> 
>>      /*
>> -      * Did any of the 'flush_on_clear' flags was clleared set from between
>> +      * Did any of the 'flush_on_clear' flags was cleared set from between
> 
> It should be more like:
> 
>         * Were any of the 'flush_on_clear' flags changed between
> 
> X86 people, does that make sense to you?

It’s not a test whether the flags are changed, but whether they are cleared.

Let’s see if we can make it clearer with shorter sentences. How about:
“Consider the ‘flush_on_clear’ flags that are set on ‘oldflags’; Flush if
any of these flags is cleared on ’newflags’”.