Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Update reg maxitems

From: Bhupesh Sharma
Date: Thu Sep 29 2022 - 02:21:14 EST


Hi Rob,

On 9/13/22 2:44 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:23:42AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
On 9/8/22 8:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 07/09/2022 22:49, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
Since the Qualcomm dwmac based ETHQOS ethernet block
supports 64-bit register addresses, update the
reg maxitems inside snps,dwmac YAML bindings.

Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
process:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L586


Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
index 2b6023ce3ac1..f89ca308d55f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ properties:
reg:
minItems: 1
- maxItems: 2
+ maxItems: 4

Qualcomm ETHQOS schema allows only 2 in reg-names, so this does not make
sense for Qualcomm and there are no users of 4 items.

On this platform the two reg spaces are 64-bit, whereas for other
platforms based on dwmmac, for e.g. stm32 have 32-bit address space.

The schema for reg is how many addr/size entries regardless of cell
sizes.

Without this fix I was getting the following error with 'make dtbs_check':

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ethqos.example.dtb:
ethernet@20000: reg: [[0, 131072], [0, 65536], [0, 221184], [0, 256]] is too
long
From schema: /home/bhsharma/code/upstream/linux-bckup/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml

The default cell sizes for examples is 1 for addr/size. If you want it
to be 2, you have to write your own parent node. But why? It's just an
example. Use 1 cell like the example originally had.

Got your point. Let me revert to the original example in v2.

Thanks,
Bhupesh