Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/fpu: Correct the legacy state offset and size information

From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Wed Sep 28 2022 - 18:32:34 EST


On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> On 9/28/2022 2:06 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > > index a3f7045d1f8e..ac2ec5d6e7e4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > > @@ -143,8 +143,13 @@ static unsigned int xfeature_get_offset(u64 xcomp_bv, int xfeature)
> > > * offsets.
> > > */
> > > if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XCOMPACTED) ||
> > > - xfeature <= XFEATURE_SSE)
> > > + xfeature <= XFEATURE_SSE) {
> > > + if (xfeature <= XFEATURE_SSE)
> > > + pr_warn("The legacy state (%d) is discontiguously located.\n",
> > > + xfeature);
> >
> > pr_warn() here isn't warranted. copy_uabi_to_xstate() calls this with non-extended
> > features,
>
> I think patch1 makes changes not to call this for legacy features anymore.

Oh, even better! In that case, drop patch 3 and WARN here, because with that
call site gone, all paths that lead to xfeature_get_offset() avoid calling it
with legacy features.

The comment above this probably needs to be updated too.

I was going to make that suggestion in my original response, but I didn't apply
the series and so didn't see that that last remaining wart was fixed. Thanks,
and sorry for the runaround!

> > which is perfectly fine since it manually handles MXCSR. And that helper
> > is directly reachable by userspace, i.e. userspace can spam the pr_warn().
>
> I don't think I get your point. I assume that helper is __raw_xsave_addr().
> But then I'm missing how it can be directly reached by userspace.

ioctl(KVM_GET_XSAVE) can reach this code, i.e. if there were a bug then userspace
could invoke that ioctl() in a tight loop to spam the kernel log.