Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/vsprintf: Initialize vsprintf's pointer hash once the random core is ready.

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

On 9/28/22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I could replace "system_unbound_wq" with "system_wq" when
>> pushing. Is anybody against it, please?
>
> so schedule_delayed_work() then?
> I don't mind at all. I used that one just because serialisation is not
> needed and neither is the CPU important.

Indeed, given that this very much is unbound, I think Sebastian's
original patch makes most sense.

Jason