Re: [Resend PATCH v2] tracing: Disable interrupt or preemption before acquiring arch_spinlock_t

[Waiman Long]

On 9/27/22 13:12, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:28:13 -0400
> Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 9/22/22 10:56, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > It was found that some tracing functions in kernel/trace/trace.c acquire
> > > an arch_spinlock_t with preemption and irqs enabled. An example is the
> > > tracing_saved_cmdlines_size_read() function which intermittently causes
> > > a "BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible" warning when the LTP
> > > read_all_proc test is run.
> > >
> > > That can be problematic in case preemption happens after acquiring the
> > > lock. Add the necessary preemption or interrupt disabling code in the
> > > appropriate places before acquiring an arch_spinlock_t.
> > >
> > > The convention here is to disable preemption for trace_cmdline_lock and
> > > interupt for max_lock.
> > >
> > > Fixes: a35873a0993b ("tracing: Add conditional snapshot")
> > > Fixes: 939c7a4f04fc ("tracing: Introduce saved_cmdlines_size file")
> > > Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >    kernel/trace/trace.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >    1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > Ping!
> >
> > Any comment on this patch?
> You may have noticed (from today's emailing) I applied the patch ;-)

Yes, I saw it after I sent this mail :-)

Thanks,
Longman