Re: [PATCH 00/11] perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Add per-thread test

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Mon Sep 26 2022 - 15:35:31 EST


Em Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:25:07AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 13/09/22 20:41, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 1:34 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Here is a new per-thread test for the test_intel_pt.sh test script.
> >>
> >> The first 9 patches are tidy-ups for the script, mostly based on results
> >> from the shellcheck utility.
> >>
> >> The 10th patch adds debug prints that the script will capture to help
> >> verify correct operation.
> >>
> >> The final patch actually adds the new test.
> >>
> >>
> >> Adrian Hunter (11):
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Add cleanup function
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Use a temp directory
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Fix redirection
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Stop using expr
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Stop using backticks
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Use grep -c instead of grep plus wc -l
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Use quotes around variable expansion
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Fix return checking
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Add more output in preparation for more tests
> >> perf tools: Add debug messages and comments for testing
> >> perf test: test_intel_pt.sh: Add per-thread test
> >
> > I don't think I understood all the black magic in patch 11. :)
>
> It is not that bad :-)

:-)

Thanks, applied the series.

- Arnaldo

> Consider the output from the test:
>
>
> $ perf test -v " intel pt"
> Couldn't bump rlimit(MEMLOCK), failures may take place when creating BPF maps, etc
> 102: Miscellaneous Intel PT testing :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 155646
> <SNIP>
> --- Test per-thread recording ---
> Workload PIDs are 155669 and 155670
> perf PID is 155681
> Waiting for "perf record has started" message
> OK
> pid 155669 cpu -1 fd 5 : sys_perf_event_open: pid 155669 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 5
>
> awk has matched the debug message and determined the values for pid, cpu and fd
>
> pid 155673 cpu -1 fd 6 : sys_perf_event_open: pid 155673 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 6
> pid 155670 cpu -1 fd 7 : sys_perf_event_open: pid 155670 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 7
> pid 155672 cpu -1 fd 8 : sys_perf_event_open: pid 155672 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 8
> pid 155669 cpu -1 fd 9 : sys_perf_event_open: pid 155669 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 9
> pid 155673 cpu -1 fd 10 : sys_perf_event_open: pid 155673 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 10
> pid 155670 cpu -1 fd 11 : sys_perf_event_open: pid 155670 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 11
> pid 155672 cpu -1 fd 12 : sys_perf_event_open: pid 155672 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 12
> fd 5 : idx 0: mmapping fd 5
>
> awk has matched the debug message and determined the values for fd
>
> fd 9 fd_to 5 : idx 0: set output fd 9 -> 5
>
> awk has matched the debug message and determined the values for fd and fd_to
>
> fd 6 : idx 1: mmapping fd 6
> fd 10 fd_to 6 : idx 1: set output fd 10 -> 6
> fd 7 : idx 2: mmapping fd 7
> fd 11 fd_to 7 : idx 2: set output fd 11 -> 7
> fd 8 : idx 3: mmapping fd 8
> fd 12 fd_to 8 : idx 3: set output fd 12 -> 8
> Checking 8 fds
>
> Now awk is checking:
> - every fd is mmapped or set-output
> - there is 1 mmap per unique pid
> - there is 1 mmap per unique cpu
> - there are the right number of different pids
> i.e.
> END {
> print "Checking " length(fd_array) " fds"
> for (fd in fd_array) {
> if (fd in mmap_array) {
> pid = pid_array[fd]
> if (pid != -1) {
> if (pid in pids) {
> print "More than 1 mmap for PID " pid
> exit 1
> }
> pids[pid] = 1
> }
> cpu = cpu_array[fd]
> if (cpu != -1) {
> if (cpu in cpus) {
> print "More than 1 mmap for CPU " cpu
> exit 1
> }
> cpus[cpu] = 1
> }
> } else if (!(fd in set_output_array)) {
> print "No mmap for fd " fd
> exit 1
> }
> }
> n = length(pids)
> if (n != thread_cnt) {
> print "Expected " thread_cnt " per-thread mmaps - found " n
> exit 1
> }
> }
>
> > At least we can move some helper functions to the lib and
> > reuse them in other tests. I'll test that later..
> >
> > So for patch 01-10,
> >
> > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Namhyung
> >
> >
> >>
> >> tools/lib/perf/evlist.c | 2 +
> >> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 8 +
> >> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_intel_pt.sh | 307 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 2 +
> >> 4 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Adrian

--

- Arnaldo