Re: [PATCH mm] mm: fix BUG with kvzalloc+GFP_ATOMIC

[Florian Westphal]

Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > kvzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) was perfectly fine, is this illegal again?
> 
> kvmalloc has never really supported GFP_ATOMIC semantic.

It did, you added it:
ce91f6ee5b3b ("mm: kvmalloc does not fallback to vmalloc for incompatible gfp flags")