Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] iommu/mediatek: Introduce new flag TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Tue Sep 13 2022 - 10:00:28 EST


On 13/09/2022 14:24, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> In preparation for adding support for MT6795, add a new flag named
> TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173 and use that instead of checking for m4u_plat
> type in mtk_iommu_hw_init() to avoid seeing a long list of m4u_plat
> checks there in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 7e363b1f24df..b511359376f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@
> #define PM_CLK_AO BIT(15)
> #define IFA_IOMMU_PCIE_SUPPORT BIT(16)
> #define PGTABLE_PA_35_EN BIT(17)
> +#define TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173 BIT(18)
>
> #define MTK_IOMMU_HAS_FLAG_MASK(pdata, _x, mask) \
> ((((pdata)->flags) & (mask)) == (_x))
> @@ -955,7 +956,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data, unsigned int ban
> * Global control settings are in bank0. May re-init these global registers
> * since no sure if there is bank0 consumers.
> */
> - if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173) {
> + if (MTK_IOMMU_HAS_FLAG(data->plat_data, TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173)) {
> regval = F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD |
> F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR_MT8173;
> } else {
> @@ -1427,7 +1428,8 @@ static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8167_data = {
> static const struct mtk_iommu_plat_data mt8173_data = {
> .m4u_plat = M4U_MT8173,
> .flags = HAS_4GB_MODE | HAS_BCLK | RESET_AXI |
> - HAS_LEGACY_IVRP_PADDR | MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_MM,
> + HAS_LEGACY_IVRP_PADDR | MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_MM |
> + TF_PORT_TO_ADDR_MT8173,
> .inv_sel_reg = REG_MMU_INV_SEL_GEN1,
> .banks_num = 1,
> .banks_enable = {true},
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index 5a9754442bc7..cd415ed1f4ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_sleep_ctrl_enable(struct mtk_smi_larb *larb)
> if (ret) {
> /* TODO: Reset this larb if it fails here. */
> dev_err(larb->smi.dev, "sleep ctrl is not ready(0x%x).\n", tmp);
> + ret = -EAGAIN;

Doesn't look related nor explained in commit msg.


Best regards,
Krzysztof