Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Indicate regulator-allow-set-load dependencies

From: Andrew Halaney
Date: Wed Sep 07 2022 - 16:54:31 EST


On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 08:28:11AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 03:19:59PM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> > For RPMH regulators it doesn't make sense to indicate
> > regulator-allow-set-load without saying what modes you can switch to,
> > so be sure to indicate a dependency on regulator-allowed-modes.
> >
> > With this in place devicetree validation can catch issues like this:
> >
> > /mnt/extrassd/git/linux-next/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-hdk.dtb: pm8350-rpmh-regulators: ldo5: 'regulator-allowed-modes' is a dependency of 'regulator-allow-set-load'
> > From schema: /mnt/extrassd/git/linux-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml
> >
> > Suggested-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > ---
> >
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220902185148.635292-1-ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Dropped first two patches in the series as they were user error
> > (thanks Krzysztof for highlighting this!)
> > - No change in the remaining patch
> >
> > Krzysztof also asked if this patch in particular should apply to other
> > regulators, which I think it should for those regulator's who implement
> > set_mode(). Unfortunately I don't know of a good way to get that
> > information in order to apply it at a broader scope for devicetree
> > regulator validation. At least with this in place RPMH users can get
> > better coverage... if someone has suggestions for how to broaden the
> > scope I'm all ears!
>
> I guess the commit message could have tried to capture that is feature
> of the hardware (as Linux implementation details shouldn't impact the
> binding). And apparently there are regulators that do not need this
> (e.g. RPM).
>
> Johan
>

Thanks for the suggestion Johan. I've posted another spin with that
addition and your (and Douglas') R-B tags over here:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220907204924.173030-1-ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

Thanks,
Andrew