Re: [Phishing Risk] Re: [Phishing Risk] [External] Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated mems.policy type.

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 08:06:30PM +0800, Zhongkun He wrote:
> It would be better if one process had a way to dynamically modify the
> mempolicy of another process. But unfortunately there is no interface or
> system call to do that in userspace.

If you need to change the properties dynamically, I suggest adding this as a
dynamic per-process interface first. That's more generic and useful for more
cases.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun