RE: [RFC PATCH v3 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: support ops registration for CDX bus

From: Gupta, Nipun
Date: Tue Sep 06 2022 - 23:17:49 EST


[AMD Official Use Only - General]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 5:41 AM
> To: Gupta, Nipun <Nipun.Gupta@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx;
> alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx; Gupta, Puneet (DCG-ENG)
> <puneet.gupta@xxxxxxx>; song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx; f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx;
> jeffrey.l.hugo@xxxxxxxxx; Michael.Srba@xxxxxxxxx; mani@xxxxxxxxxx;
> yishaih@xxxxxxxxxx; jgg@xxxxxxxx; jgg@xxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx;
> will@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx;
> ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; okaya@xxxxxxxxxx; Anand,
> Harpreet <harpreet.anand@xxxxxxx>; Agarwal, Nikhil
> <nikhil.agarwal@xxxxxxx>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>;
> Radovanovic, Aleksandar <aleksandar.radovanovic@xxxxxxx>; git (AMD-Xilinx)
> <git@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: support ops registration
> for CDX bus
>
> [CAUTION: External Email]
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:48 AM Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > With new CDX bus supported for AMD FPGA devices on ARM
> > platform, the bus requires registration for the SMMU v3
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > index d32b02336411..8ec9f2baf12d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/amba/bus.h>
> > +#include <linux/cdx/cdx_bus.h>
> >
> > #include "arm-smmu-v3.h"
> > #include "../../iommu-sva-lib.h"
> > @@ -3690,16 +3691,27 @@ static int arm_smmu_set_bus_ops(struct
> iommu_ops *ops)
> > if (err)
> > goto err_reset_pci_ops;
> > }
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CDX_BUS
> > + if (cdx_bus_type.iommu_ops != ops) {
> > + err = bus_set_iommu(&cdx_bus_type, ops);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_reset_amba_ops;
> > + }
>
> I'm not an expert on IOMMUs, so apologies if the question is stupid.
>
> Why does the CDX bus need special treatment here (like PCI) when there
> are so many other busses (eg: I2C, SPI, etc) that don't need any
> changes here?

AFAIU, the devices on I2C/SPI does not use SMMU. Apart from PCI/AMBA,
FSL-MC is another similar bus (on SMMUv2) which uses SMMU ops.

The devices here are behind SMMU. Robin can kindly correct or add
more here from SMMU perspective.

Thanks,
Nipun

>
> -Saravana
>
> > #endif
> > if (platform_bus_type.iommu_ops != ops) {
> > err = bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, ops);
> > if (err)
> > - goto err_reset_amba_ops;
> > + goto err_reset_cdx_ops;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > -err_reset_amba_ops:
> > +err_reset_cdx_ops:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CDX_BUS
> > + bus_set_iommu(&cdx_bus_type, NULL);
> > +#endif
> > +err_reset_amba_ops: __maybe_unused;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_AMBA
> > bus_set_iommu(&amba_bustype, NULL);
> > #endif
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >