Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Use additionalProperties

[Andrew Halaney]

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 06:53:23PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/09/2022 18:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 02/09/2022 20:51, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> >> Right now, running make dt_binding_check results in this snippet:
> >>
> >>     /mnt/extrassd/git/linux-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property
> >>             hint: A schema without a "$ref" to another schema must define all properties and use "additionalProperties"
> >>             from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/base.yaml#
> >>       SCHEMA  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> >>     <snip..>
> >>     /mnt/extrassd/git/linux-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml: ignoring, error in schema:
> >>
> >> Which results in the schema not being properly evaluated. Swap out
> >> unevaluatedProperties which doesn't seem to be doing anything for
> >> additionalProperties.
> > 
> > unevaluatedProperties were required due to usage of defs-allOf
> > (ba5d99609a5e ("regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: document supplies per
> > variant")
> > ).
> > 
> > Are you sure that it works correctly with additionalProperties?
> > 
> > Judging by errors it doesn't....
> 
> What's more - I cannot reproduce that error (latest released dtschema)...
> 

Ugh, I thought maybe I had ran into something here that was only in
linux-next, but no. I've had my environment borked the whole time I was
working on this series. So sorry about that.

I'll send a v2 once I rework things with my environment working
properly. Your comments here make sense to me -- unevaluatedProperties
makes sense here based on what I see in the example binding... so this
patch and the next will get dropped entirely.

Thanks,
Andrew