[PATCH 5.15 007/107] skmsg: Fix wrong last sg check in sk_msg_recvmsg()

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Sep 06 2022 - 09:45:05 EST


From: Liu Jian <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 583585e48d965338e73e1eb383768d16e0922d73 ]

Fix one kernel NULL pointer dereference as below:

[ 224.462334] Call Trace:
[ 224.462394] __tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0xd3/0x380
[ 224.462441] ? sock_has_perm+0x78/0xa0
[ 224.462463] tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0x12e/0x220
[ 224.462494] inet_recvmsg+0x5b/0xd0
[ 224.462534] __sys_recvfrom+0xc8/0x130
[ 224.462574] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1df/0x2e0
[ 224.462606] ? __do_page_fault+0x2de/0x500
[ 224.462635] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x24/0x30
[ 224.462660] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0
[ 224.462709] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca

In commit 9974d37ea75f ("skmsg: Fix invalid last sg check in
sk_msg_recvmsg()"), we change last sg check to sg_is_last(),
but in sockmap redirection case (without stream_parser/stream_verdict/
skb_verdict), we did not mark the end of the scatterlist. Check the
sk_msg_alloc, sk_msg_page_add, and bpf_msg_push_data functions, they all
do not mark the end of sg. They are expected to use sg.end for end
judgment. So the judgment of '(i != msg_rx->sg.end)' is added back here.

Fixes: 9974d37ea75f ("skmsg: Fix invalid last sg check in sk_msg_recvmsg()")
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220809094915.150391-1-liujian56@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/skmsg.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 4ddcfac344984..054073c7cbb95 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ int sk_msg_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, struct msghdr *msg,

if (copied == len)
break;
- } while (!sg_is_last(sge));
+ } while ((i != msg_rx->sg.end) && !sg_is_last(sge));

if (unlikely(peek)) {
msg_rx = sk_psock_next_msg(psock, msg_rx);
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ int sk_msg_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, struct msghdr *msg,
}

msg_rx->sg.start = i;
- if (!sge->length && sg_is_last(sge)) {
+ if (!sge->length && (i == msg_rx->sg.end || sg_is_last(sge))) {
msg_rx = sk_psock_dequeue_msg(psock);
kfree_sk_msg(msg_rx);
}
--
2.35.1