Re: [PATCH v1 10/11] watchdog: bd9576_wdt: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Mon Sep 05 2022 - 11:14:05 EST


On 9/5/22 04:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:33 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
fwnode property API.

While at it switch the rest of the calls to read properties in

it, switch

bd9576_wdt_probe() to the generic device property API as well.

...

struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;

struct device *parent = dev->parent;

can make your code slightly neater.

...

+ count = device_property_count_u32(dev->parent, "rohm,hw-timeout-ms");
+ if (count < 0 && count != -EINVAL)
+ return count;
+
+ if (count > 0) {

+ if (count > ARRAY_SIZE(hw_margin))
+ return -EINVAL;

Why double check? You may move it out of the (count > 0).


Two checks will always be needed, so I don't entirely see
how that would be better.

...

- if (ret == 1)
- hw_margin_max = hw_margin[0];

+ ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev->parent,
+ "rohm,hw-timeout-ms",
+ hw_margin, count);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;

So, only this needs the count > 0 check since below already has it implicitly.

Sorry, I don't understand this comment.

Guenter

- if (ret == 2) {
- hw_margin_max = hw_margin[1];
- hw_margin_min = hw_margin[0];
+ if (count == 1)
+ hw_margin_max = hw_margin[0];
+
+ if (count == 2) {
+ hw_margin_max = hw_margin[1];
+ hw_margin_min = hw_margin[0];
+ }
}