Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] objtool/powerpc: Add --mcount specific implementation

[Naveen N. Rao]

Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:50:07PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Le 29/08/2022 à 07:52, Sathvika Vasireddy a écrit :
> > > +	opcode = insn >> 26;
> > > +
> > > +	switch (opcode) {
> > > +	case 18: /* bl */
> >
> > case 18 is more than 'bl', it includes also 'b'.
> > In both cases, the calculation of *immediate is the same.
>
> It also is "ba" and "bla", sometimes written as "b[l][a]".
>
> > It would therefore be more correct to perform the calculation and setup 
> > of *immediate outside the 'if ((insn & 3) == 1)', that would avoid 
> > unnecessary churn the day we add support for branches without link.

Yeah, and probably move the comments around:

+	case 18: /* b[l][a] */
+		if ((insn & 3) == 1) { /* bl */

> > > +		if ((insn & 3) == 1) {
> > > +			*type = INSN_CALL;
> > > +			*immediate = insn & 0x3fffffc;
> > > +			if (*immediate & 0x2000000)
> > > +				*immediate -= 0x4000000;
> > > +		}
> > > +		break;
> > > +	}
>
> Does this handle AA=1 correctly at all?  That is valid both with and
> without relocations, just like AA=0.  Same for AA=1 LK=0 btw.
>
> If you only handle AA=0, the code should explicitly test for that.

The code does test for AA=0 LK=1 with the if statement there?


- Naveen