Re: [char-misc:char-misc-testing 20/24] drivers/misc/mchp_pci1xxxx/mchp_pci1xxxx_gp.c:87:52: error: 'PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES' undeclared

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Sep 02 2022 - 03:02:59 EST


On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 06:13:10AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git char-misc-testing
> head: 51ea3f9e9017b47c15b37a200d8e81e36a169b70
> commit: 3f359bf61b6f65be474fbcdf557cd412f19d0f1d [20/24] misc: microchip: pci1xxxx: load auxiliary bus driver for the PIO function in the multi-function endpoint of pci1xxxx device.
> config: sh-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220902/202209020641.mPiacQEP-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git/commit/?id=3f359bf61b6f65be474fbcdf557cd412f19d0f1d
> git remote add char-misc https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git
> git fetch --no-tags char-misc char-misc-testing
> git checkout 3f359bf61b6f65be474fbcdf557cd412f19d0f1d
> # save the config file
> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=sh SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/misc/mchp_pci1xxxx/
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/misc/mchp_pci1xxxx/mchp_pci1xxxx_gp.c: In function 'gp_aux_bus_probe':
> >> drivers/misc/mchp_pci1xxxx/mchp_pci1xxxx_gp.c:87:52: error: 'PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 87 | retval = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Odd.

Ah, the driver needs to have a "depends on PCI" for the Kconfig file.

Kumaravel, can you send an add-on patch for this issue with the proper
"Reported-by:" line as asked for above?

thanks,

greg k-h