[PATCH v3 5/5] sched/fair: cleanup for SIS_PROP

From: Abel Wu
Date: Thu Sep 01 2022 - 23:31:39 EST


The sched-domain of this cpu is only used when SIS_PROP is enabled,
and it should be irrelevant whether the local sd_llc is valid or
not, since all we care about is target sd_llc if !SIS_PROP.

Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 23b020c3d3a0..7bad641faef9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6396,19 +6396,19 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share;
struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
int this = smp_processor_id();
- struct sched_domain *this_sd;
+ struct sched_domain *this_sd = NULL;
u64 time = 0;

- this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc));
- if (!this_sd)
- return -1;
-
cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);

if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
unsigned long now = jiffies;

+ this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc));
+ if (!this_sd)
+ return -1;
+
/*
* If we're busy, the assumption that the last idle period
* predicts the future is flawed; age away the remaining
@@ -6462,7 +6462,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
if (has_idle_core)
set_idle_cores(target, false);

- if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
+ if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && this_sd && !has_idle_core) {
time = cpu_clock(this) - time;

/*
--
2.31.1