Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: Factor out common properties of LPDDR bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 31/08/2022 04:33, Julius Werner wrote:
> The bindings for different LPDDR versions mostly use the same kinds of
> properties, so in order to reduce duplication when we're adding support
> for more versions, this patch creates a new lpddr-props subschema that
> can be referenced by the others to define these common parts. (This will
> consider a few smaller I/O width and density numbers "legal" for LPDDR3
> that are usually not used there, but this should be harmless.)
> 
> This also un-deprecates the manufacturer ID property for LPDDR3 (and
> introduces it to LPDDR2), since it was found that having this
> information available in a separate property can be useful in some
> cases.

Why do you need to un-deprecate them if you have this information in
compatible? This was not exactly the previous consensus. My statement
was ok for un-deprecating if you cannot derive them from compatible. Now
you can. This should be the same as USB device schema.

Best regards,
Krzysztof