[PATCH v6 14/33] KVM: nVMX: WARN once and fail VM-Enter if eVMCS sees VMFUNC[63:32] != 0

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Date: Tue Aug 30 2022 - 09:39:57 EST


From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

WARN and reject nested VM-Enter if KVM is using eVMCS and manages to
allow a non-zero value in the upper 32 bits of VM-function controls. The
eVMCS code assumes all inputs are 32-bit values and subtly drops the
upper bits. WARN instead of adding proper "support", it's unlikely the
upper bits will be defined/used in the next decade.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
index c3a5309f6e82..b64e29f1359f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
@@ -469,6 +469,14 @@ int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
vmcs12->vm_entry_controls)))
return -EINVAL;

+ /*
+ * VM-Func controls are 64-bit, but KVM currently doesn't support any
+ * controls in bits 63:32, i.e. dropping those bits on the consistency
+ * check is intentional.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vmcs12->vm_function_control >> 32))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_VMFUNC,
vmcs12->vm_function_control)))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.37.2