Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: drivers: Remove unnecessary print function dev_err()

[Christophe JAILLET]

Le 25/08/2022 à 09:04, Yang Li a écrit :
> The print function dev_err() is redundant because
> platform_get_irq_byname() already prints an error.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=1986
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c | 6 ++----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c
> index 7ba2594e437c..ab16e6665625 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c
> @@ -363,11 +363,9 @@ static int tps65219_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		irq_type = &tps65219_regulator_irq_types[i];
>   
>   		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_type->irq_name);
> -		if (irq < 0) {
> -			dev_err(tps->dev, "Failed to get IRQ %s: %d\n",
> -				irq_type->irq_name, irq);
> +		if (irq < 0)
>   			return -EINVAL;
> -		}
> +
>   		irq_data[i].dev = tps->dev;
>   		irq_data[i].type = irq_type;
>   

Hi,

just in case it has an importance, this is not exactly the same.
Previously, the error was related to 'pdev', now it is related to 'tps' 
and we have:
	'struct tps65219 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);'

I don't think it really matters, but just in case...

CJ