Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] cpumask: UP optimisation fixes follow-up

From: Sander Vanheule
Date: Wed Aug 10 2022 - 04:18:24 EST


On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 21:55 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 07:36:32PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > As an older version of the UP optimisation fixes was merged, not all
> > review feedback has been implemented.  These patches implement the
> > feedback received on the merged version [1], and the respin [2], for
> > changes related to include/linux/cpumask.h and lib/cpumask.c.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1656777646.git.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1659077534.git.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Sander Vanheule (3):
> >   cpumask: align signatures of UP implementations
> >   lib/cpumask: add inline cpumask_next_wrap() for UP
> >   lib/cpumask: drop always-true preprocessor guard
>
> Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Applying at bitmap-for-next, after some testing.

Thanks! Any chance to get this in for 6.0? I would rather avoid building cpumask.o only on 6.0, but
otherwise I don't think anything is functionally wrong with what is currently merged.

Best,
Sander