Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] bpf: Allow kfuncs to be used in LSM programs

From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Tue Aug 09 2022 - 17:54:20 EST


On 8/9/22 3:45 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>

In preparation for the addition of bpf_getxattr kfunc.

Given this is taken out of context and the series is not about bpf_getxattr,
this patch should have a better commit description.

Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Please also append your SoB then [0].

[0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1

---
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index d3e4c86b8fcd..67dfc728fbf8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -7244,6 +7244,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_type_to_kfunc_hook(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_STRUCT_OPS;
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_TRACING;
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL:
return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_SYSCALL;