Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Introduce cooldown timer to AMDPSP driver

[Jarkko Nikula]

Hi

Sorry the delay, this slipped through my eyes during vacation. Couple 
minor comments below.

On 7/25/22 11:02, Jan Dabros wrote:
> In order to optimize performance, limit amount of back and forth
> transactions between x86 and PSP. This is done by introduction of
> cooldown period - that is window in which x86 isn't releasing the bus
> immediately after each I2C transaction.
>
> In order to protect PSP from being starved while waiting for
> arbitration, after a programmed time bus is automatically released by a
> deferred function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> index b624356c945f..2e1bb5ae72c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>   #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
>   #include <linux/psp-sev.h>
>   #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/msr.h>
>   
> @@ -15,6 +16,8 @@
>   #define PSP_MBOX_OFFSET		0x10570
>   #define PSP_CMD_TIMEOUT_US	(500 * USEC_PER_MSEC)
>   
> +#define PSP_I2C_COOLDOWN_TIME_MS 100
> +

"cooldown" distract me thinking thermal management. Would semaphore 
reservation time/timer fit better?

> +static void release_bus_now(void)
> +static void psp_release_i2c_bus_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
> +static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(release_queue, psp_release_i2c_bus_deferred);
> +

I'd use the same namespace here. Perhaps _now can be dropped from the 
name since the release_bus and release_bus_deferred are near to each 
other and _deferred variant implies it's called after timeout.

> +	/*
> +	 * Send a release command to PSP if the cooldown timeout elapsed but x86 still
> +	 * owns the ctrlr.
> +	 */

Replace "ctrlr" -> "control" here since then it doesn't lead to think 
is't some technical object like register etc.