Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Don't disable EIOINTC master core

From: Huacai Chen
Date: Tue Aug 09 2022 - 05:19:55 EST


Hi, Marc,

On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2022 08:45:22 +0100,
> Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This patch fix a CPU hotplug issue. The EIOINTC master core (the first
> > core of an EIOINTC node) should not be disabled at runtime, since it has
> > the responsibility of dispatching I/O interrupts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c | 9 +++++++++
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c
> > index 09743103d9b3..54901716f8de 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -242,9 +242,18 @@ void loongson3_smp_finish(void)
> >
> > static bool io_master(int cpu)
> > {
> > + int i, node, master;
> > +
> > if (cpu == 0)
> > return true;
> >
> > + for (i = 1; i < loongson_sysconf.nr_io_pics; i++) {
> > + node = eiointc_get_node(i);
> > + master = cpu_number_map(node * CORES_PER_EIO_NODE);
> > + if (cpu == master)
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
> > index 170dbc96c7d3..6c99a2ff95f5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ static void eiointc_enable(void)
> > iocsr_write64(misc, LOONGARCH_IOCSR_MISC_FUNC);
> > }
> >
> > +int eiointc_get_node(int id)
> > +{
> > + return eiointc_priv[id]->node;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int cpu_to_eio_node(int cpu)
> > {
> > return cpu_logical_map(cpu) / CORES_PER_EIO_NODE;
>
>
> I don't understand why it has to be this complex and make any use of
> the node number.
>
> As I understand it, CPU-0 in any EIOINTC block is a master. So all you
> need to find out is whether the CPU number is a multiple of
> CORES_PER_EIO_NODE.
CPU-0 in any EIOINTC block may be a master, but not absolutely be a
master to dispatch I/O interrupts. If there is no bridge under a
EIOINTC, then this EIOINTC doesn't handle I/O interrupts, and it can
be disabled at runtime.

Huacai
>
> Something like:
>
> return (cpu_logical_map(cpu) % CORES_PER_EIO_NODE) == 0;
>
> which doesn't require exporting anything from anywhere?
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.