Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] clk: npcm8xx: add clock controller

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Tomer Maimon (2022-08-04 07:01:30)
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 at 01:56, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Because it is jumbled in some range?
> Yes.
> >
> > >
> > > I do see a way to combine the clock and the reset driver, the NPCM
> > > reset driver is serving other NPCM BMC's.
> > > Should we use regmap to handle the clock registers instead of ioremap?
> >
> > Sure? Using regmap or not looks like a parallel discussion. How does it
> > help use platform APIs?
> I mean to use regmap API instead of platform API for handing the clock
> and reset registers.
> the regmap API gives only one user access to R/W (lock).
> I will be happy to get more suggestions, on how should we solve this situation.
> 

Using platform APIs means using platform_*() functions, not of_*()
functions, which are open-firmware/DT related. Regmap can be used to
operate on registers mapped as __iomem, which is different from platform
APIs.

Is having a lock even necessary? Do the reset and clk controls live
within a shared register where we would need to prevent one driver from
accessing that register at the same time as the other?