Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: no sync wakeup from interrupt context

[Ingo Molnar]

* Libo Chen <libo.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Oh yes, I have no issue with holding the patch back until the regression 
> is fully understood. I was just a little confused on your reference to 
> Mel's comments. [...]

Yeah, that was just me getting confused about which change Mel was 
referring to, as I was looking for external confirmation saying what I was 
thinking about the patch: in_task()/in_interrupt() heuristics rarely do 
well. ;-)

> Anyway, I will post my investigation soon.

Thx - and measurements will always be able to override any negative 
expectations of mine, so my comments weren't a NAK.

Thanks,

	Ingo