Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] PM6125 regulator support

[Iskren Chernev]

>>
>> Iskren Chernev (13):
>>    dt-bindings: regulator: qcom_spmi: Improve formatting of if-then
>>      blocks
>>    dt-bindings: regulator: qcom_spmi: Document PM6125 PMIC
>>    dt-bindings: regulator: qcom_smd: Sort compatibles alphabetically
>>    dt-bindings: regulator: qcom_smd: Document PM6125 PMIC
>>    regulator: qcom_spmi: Add support for new regulator types
>>    regulator: qcom_spmi: Add support for HFSMPS regulator type
>>    regulator: qcom_spmi: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 1)
>>    regulator: qcom_spmi: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 2)
>>    regulator: qcom_spmi: Add PM6125 PMIC support
>>    regulator: qcom_smd: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 1)
>>    regulator: qcom_smd: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 2)
>>    regulator: qcom_smd: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 3)
>
> What is the reason for these part1/2 and part1/2/3 splits? I think you can collapse them into two respective patches, one sorting of spmi, another one sorting the smd regulators

The reason is that if I do collapse them the diff looks much more
complicated and it's not obvious that the sections are in-fact only moved.
I'm not sure how these are reviewed, but casually reading the patch will
not instill confidence.